Our lead case is about bats. It would have been perfect for the
October issue.
We report a case from a Maryland United States District Court in which
several groups of environmentalists sued Invenergy (the 5th largest wind
developer in the United States) to enjoin construction and operation of
122 new wind turbines ("Project") being built in West
Virginia-because those turbines would allegedly harm, kill or injure
endangered Indiana bats.
In a battle of the expert witnesses, the environmentalists were
successful in persuading the Court that:
"Wind energy facilities cause bat mortality and injuries through
wind turbine collisions and also from barotraumas, a damage caused to
bats' lungs and eardrums as a result of the rapid change in external
pressure...The construction of the wind energy projects may kill, injure
or disrupt bat behavior."
The Court concluded that the wind developer could complete the 40
turbines already under construction, but those 40 turbines could only be
operated from November 16 to March 31 of each year-when Indiana bats are
in hibernation.
The Project, upon completion, would have produced 186 megawatts of
electricity. Invenergy had signed a 20-year contract with
Appalachian Power Company to sell all output from the first phase (167
turbines) of the Project.
The Court stated Congress had intended that endangered species be given
the highest priority; and-also-Congress has strongly encouraged the
development of clean, renewable energy, including wind energy.
What federal tightrope.
Would you like to read more? Click here to subscribe to the Currin Energy Page®!